How to Say No to PCR

Just recently, the NFL did a sudden reexamination and update to its “Covid-19” testing protocols as far too many star players were testing positive and missing games. This obviously led to the games either having to be rescheduled or forfeited altogether which is a disaster for the ratings hungry league. According to the NFL, 94.6%… Continue reading How to Say No to PCR

Published
Categorized as PCR Tests

“Viral” Load of Crap

“Viral” load is a common measure that one often hears about from the CDC/WHO/MSM when discussing “Covid-19” and disease severity. It is considered an estimation of the amount of “virus” that is within a person’s body fluid. This is primarily determined through calculations based off the Cycle Threshold (Ct) Value from a PCR test. Virologists… Continue reading “Viral” Load of Crap

Published
Categorized as PCR Tests

PCR and the Prevalence Problem

“WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.“ https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2020-05… Continue reading PCR and the Prevalence Problem

Published
Categorized as PCR Tests

The IDSA and AMP Joint Statement Destroying PCR Tests

The Infectious Disease Society of America and the Association for Molecular Pathology released a joint statement in March 2021 about the PCR Test Ct Values which has given even more reasons not to trust any PCR result for this or any other “pandemic.” Together, they inadvertently destroy any argument for the use of PCR as… Continue reading The IDSA and AMP Joint Statement Destroying PCR Tests

Published
Categorized as PCR Tests

Drosten “SARS-COV-2” PCR Paper

“In Silico: in or on a computer : done or produced by using computer software or simulation“ https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/in%20silico I won’t go into too much detail regarding the Drosten PCR test as it was covered beautifully by people much better suited than I (linked below), but I would be remiss if I did not mention it… Continue reading Drosten “SARS-COV-2” PCR Paper

20 Undeniable Facts about PCR Tests

1. No PCR test has been validated against the gold standard of a purified/isolated “SARS-COV-2.” “RT-PCR assays in the UK have analytical sensitivity and specificity of greater than 95%, but no single gold standard assay exists 1.“ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30453-7/fulltext?fbclid=IwAR2XoGpPLqv1R12KCwbBwbhg6xlfp0Wtlxs2TMIVEiDd2PekxPiN-kBOWr0 Diverging for a moment to look at the citation: “No test gives a 100% accurate result; tests… Continue reading 20 Undeniable Facts about PCR Tests

Published
Categorized as PCR Tests

The Testing Pandemic

It is obvious if one were to look at this situation critically and logically that there has never been a “viral” pandemic. This has been and always will be a TESTING pandemic. So how does one create a testing pandemic without a “virus?” 1. Claim the same old detox symptoms which people go through each… Continue reading The Testing Pandemic

Published
Categorized as PCR Tests